Jay Guiliano specializes in patent litigation and reexaminations. Mr. Guiliano’s expertise involves a diverse variety of technologies including cellular telephones, player tracking devices for gaming systems, interactive voice response systems, electronic payment systems, aeronautical oxygen systems, fuel injection control systems, parking brake systems and tire pressure monitoring systems.
Mr. Guiliano also has extensive advocacy experience. In a large Multi-District Litigation, on behalf of multiple defendants, he successfully obtained a summary judgment ruling that nine representative claims from plaintiff’s billion dollar licensing portfolio were invalid as obvious.
Highlights
55 Brake LLC v. Audi of America, et al. Represented defendants Ford Motor Company, Jaguar Land Rover North America and Volvo against claims of patent infringement concerning electronic parking brake systems.
In re Ronald A. Katz Interactive Call Processing MDL 1816. Represented multiple defendants (GE, Ford Motor Co., General Motors, GMAC, Safeway, Wellpoint, Marriott, Hilton, Whirlpool, Continental, ConEd, Costco, DTE, Discover) in large Multi-District Litigation. Obtained summary judgment of invalidity for 46 representative claims resulting in favorable settlements for clients.
Caterpillar Inc. v. International Truck & Engine. Represented plaintiff Caterpillar to prove claims of infringement and negate on-sale bar defenses concerning a patent portfolio involving fuel system technology. Client obtained favorable settlement.
GTE v. Nokia and AT&T Wireless. Represented plaintiff GTE (now Verizon Wireless) in a patent infringement suit related to the over-the-air activation and programming of TDMA and CDMA cellular telephones. Secured favorable settlement for client.
Hart v. Dan Chase Taxidermy. Represented defendant Dan Chase Taxidermy against claims of copyright infringement by multiple plaintiffs. Following plaintiffs’ appeal as to non-copyrightability of certain taxidermy mannequins and remand for bench trial as to copyrightability, district court dismissed remaining claims of copyright infringement against client for lack of copyrightable subject matter.
Honeywell v. The United States et al. Represented defendant-intervenor Carleton Life Support Systems in a patent infringement suit involving on-board oxygen generating systems for military aircraft that resulted in a favorable settlement.
Verizon California Inc. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing. Represented declaratory judgment plaintiff Verizon California concerning a 20+ patent portfolio for interactive voice response systems and call processing techniques. Following a successful summary judgment ruling on 12 of the 16 asserted claims, a favorable settlement was obtained for the client.
Practice Areas
Admissions
- United States Patent & Trademark Office
- District of Columbia
- New York
- United States District Court for the District of Columbia
- United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
- United States Court of Federal Claims
Education
- Syracuse University College of Law, J.D.
- Bucknell University, B.S. Mechanical Engineering